Newsletter Subject

Trump vs. Twitter

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Thu, May 28, 2020 11:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20447836.84586/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS90ZWNobm9

[Bloomberg]( Follow Us //link.mail.bloombergbusiness.com/click/20447836.84586/aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS90ZWNobm9sb2d5/582c8673566a94262a8b49bdB84df9948 [Get the newsletter]( Hey all, it's Sarah Frier. I remember the first time the U.S. Senate [grilled]( tech executives about the Russian misinformation that spread on their sites ahead of the 2016 election. The hearing was on Halloween a year later, and senators were especially scared about Russia's lies around how to vote. They brought images of social media posts telling people to vote via Twitter, or via text message—neither of which work in U.S. elections. Whether or not it succeeded in tricking people, the lawmakers said, the attempt at suppression was a threat to the democratic process. By the 2018 midterms, Facebook had a solution. Voting misinformation could be reported and removed or fact-checked. The company, which had become a poster child for election interference attempts, touted the move in the press at the time. The signal: Facebook is taking its responsibility seriously. Now, the broader conversation about truth on social media has shifted to Twitter Inc., which started planning misinformation labelling more recently. But instead of Russia spreading inaccurate information on voting, this time, it's President Trump. This week, Trump said mail-in ballots would be "substantially fraudulent." Twitter, for the first time, [appended a subtle fact-check note]( on two of his tweets. The move caused a [firestorm of rage from Trump]( and his supporters, directly attacking the company and one of its employees. On Wednesday the White House said Trump would soon sign an executive order on social media. Largely missing from the hubbub, though, is Facebook. Trump said the same thing about mail-in ballots in a Facebook post, and the company allowed it to go viral without fact-checking notation. In an [interview on Fox](, Mark Zuckerberg said “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online." And in a statement, the company said it focuses on posts that would "interfere with the vote." Facebook has largely avoided criticism so far. Those same senators who pushed tech companies to answer for 2016 voter misinformation, have yet to call on the company to take fresh action. Facebook has been clear that it won't fact-check politicians. But there are certain kinds of speech—such as harmful coronavirus misinformation, or voter suppression—that the company has said it will always take down. And while it's debatable whether Trump's latest posts were voter suppression, it's possible that future posts from the president could walk even closer to the company's line in the sand. As we barrel closer to the November election, Facebook will no doubt have more opportunities to decide what to do when the types of posts it usually bans come from the same people who it usually allows to lie. Facebook is already in the U.S. government's crosshairs as the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice investigate possible anticompetitive behavior. Taking action on a Trump post would be riskier for Facebook than it would be for Twitter—Trump's favorite platform, which doesn't appear to be under investigation at the moment. But even Twitter is [walking a delicate line](. And after this week's blowback, Facebook executives might go to great lengths not to provoke Trump, leaving its users to determine the facts for themselves. —[Sarah Frier](mailto:sfrier1@bloomberg.net) If you read one thing TikTok’s parent company ByteDance generated more than $17 billion in revenue and more than $3 billion of net profit last year. The latest numbers show that the [world's most valuable startup is still growing quickly](, and from a very high base. For comparison: YouTube's revenue last year was $15 billion and Instagram's was $20 billion. And here’s what you need to know in global technology news SoftBank's Vision Fund, the $100 billion tech megafund that changed the startup world, has fallen on hard times. The fund is [planning to lay off 10% of staff](, Bloomberg reported. Instagram is helping its stars make money off their videos on the platform, bringing the service into [direct competition with YouTube](. The U.S. will join the rest of the G-7 nations in a partnership to help steer and conduct research on best practices in the development of artificial intelligence. The country's chief technology officer said the move was [intended as a counterbalance to Beijing surveillance](. Several Silicon Valley billionaires want to [help Joe Biden win]( the 2020 election, Vox reports. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Fully Charged newsletter. [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.