Newsletter Subject

The last unicorn or a black sheep?

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Mon, Sep 16, 2019 11:02 AM

Email Preheader Text

From    Hi folks, it’s Brad. The roadshow is set to begin this week, perhaps as soon as t

[Bloomberg] [Fully Charged]( From [Bloomberg](   [FOLLOW US [Facebook Share]]( [Twitter Share]( [SUBSCRIBE [Subscribe]](  Hi folks, it’s Brad. The [We Co.](bbg://securities/WE%20US%20Equity/DES) roadshow is set to begin this week, perhaps as soon as today. Such corporate processionals through the ranks of blue-blooded Wall Street institutions are usually a triumph for buoyant, young companies. WeWork’s roadshow, on the other hand, will likely more closely resemble Cersei Lannister’s humiliating march to the Red Keep in Game of Thrones. Shame! WeWork’s valuation, [$47 billion]( in a private funding round last January, could be set [as low as $12 billion](. Shame! Shame! Investors will no doubt be distrustful of any evidence of apparent self-dealing by the chief executive officer, Adam Neumann, such as buying properties and leasing them to the company. (WeWork took additional steps on Friday to [change some of the unorthodox aspects]( of its governance structure and seek an independent board member.) As the nine-year-old office-sharing startup continues its stumble to the public markets, [some]( [prognosticators]( see this moment as something more significant: that a WeWork belly-flop portends the end of the unicorn era in Silicon Valley. The argument goes like this: SoftBank, the Japanese conglomerate and its $100 billion Vision Fund, has become an engine pushing the technology market to its limit. If it’s forced to retreat on its $10 billion commitment to WeWork, SoftBank will reconsider the nearly blind sanguinity that has perverted incentives for founders and distorted valuations in the industry over the last few years. In this seductive vision of a calamitous—and cleansing—WeWork initial public offering, modesty will once again return to Silicon Valley; humbled venture capitalists will stop bidding the valuations of unprofitable startups into the stratosphere; and the unicorns—those magical startups worth a $1 billion or more—will be put out to pasture, their legendary horns clipped like the tusks of poached African elephants. But that’s probably wishful thinking. The current cycle in tech started more than a decade ago, fueled by excitement over the iPhone, [Facebook Inc.](bbg://securities/FB%20US%20Equity/DES) and the infusions of cash from a new generation of VCs like Andreessen Horowitz and Y Combinator. Business cycles tend to last seven to 10 years in Silicon Valley, and the resulting boom should have ended by now. But that was before the [longest bull market in American history]( and a seemingly never-ending supply of venture capital from an array of new sources, including wealthy Chinese investors and Saudi Arabian oil money. It doesn’t appear to be stopping anytime soon. The stocks of [Dropbox Inc.](bbg://securities/DBX%20US%20Equity/DES), [Lyft Inc.](bbg://securities/LYFT%20US%20Equity/DES), [Slack Technologies Inc.](bbg://securities/WORK%20US%20Equity/DES) and [Uber Technologies Inc.](bbg://securities/UBER%20US%20Equity/DES) are all under their IPO prices. And yet, many investors still believe. Uber [lost $5.2 billion]( last quarter, [dismissed more than 800 employees]( in the last two months and [lost a policy battle]( with California lawmakers last week that could rock its business model. Somehow, Uber is still worth a cool $57 billion. Meanwhile, SoftBank says it’s going to raise [another Vision Fund](, with contributions from [Apple Inc.](bbg://securities/AAPL%20US%20Equity/DES), [Microsoft Corp.](bbg://securities/MSFT%20US%20Equity/DES) and [Foxconn](bbg://securities/2317%20TT%20Equity/DES)—this one even larger than the last. The belief underlying the persistent tech boom is that savvy entrepreneurs in vast markets with access to enough capital can engineer their way through even the most challenging issues. Witness [CloudFlare Inc.](bbg://securities/NET%20US%20Equity/DES), the unprofitable internet infrastructure company that [raised $525 million]( last week at a higher-than expected market value of $4.4 billion. Investors were able to overlook recent controversies over unsavory former CloudFlare clients, like the [forum where a mass shooter hung out](, and the stock popped on the first day of trading. What will it take to really put an end to the unicorn era? Perhaps an economic recession and an accompanying withdrawal of overseas capital from the Valley. Perhaps it will take a total collapse of a once-promising unicorn to change the risk tolerance of conservative investors like endowments, pensions and sovereign wealth funds. If the WeWork IPO flops, technologists will try to dismiss it as an outlier, the bad fortune of a real estate startup that was never truly a tech company. It will be viewed not as an indictment of current excess in Silicon Valley but as an exception to it. That’s not realistic, but then again, neither are unicorns. —[Brad Stone](mailto:bstone12@bloomberg.net)  And here’s what you need to know in global technology news Speaking of SoftBank, some of its other companies would be [hit hard]( by California’s new labor bill that would force gig economy companies to hire their workers.  Lawmakers are seeking information from customers of the Big Tech companies. A House panel investigating potential antitrust violations has [contacted customers of Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook](, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. They also [asked the companies]( to hand over documents.  Disney CEO Bob Iger left the board of Apple. The long-allied companies are now [streaming rivals](.  Stanford University took money from Jeffrey Epstein, too. The school, located in the heart of Silicon Valley, [received a $50,000 donation]( from a foundation backed by the late sex offender in 2004. Other donations to [Harvard]( and [MIT]( are prompting scrutiny of the schools and their faculties.  A former Golden State Warrior is the U.S. face of Jumia, the [Amazon.com of Africa](.    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Bloomberg Technology newsletter Fully Charged. You can tell your friends to [sign up here](.  [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.