Newsletter Subject

The techlash land grab is on

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Sat, Sep 7, 2019 11:05 AM

Email Preheader Text

From Hi all, it’s Eric, with a special Saturday edition of Fully Charged. If you’

[Bloomberg] [Fully Charged]( From [Bloomberg](   [FOLLOW US [Facebook Share]]( [Twitter Share]( [SUBSCRIBE [Subscribe]](  Hi all, it’s Eric, with a special Saturday edition of Fully Charged. If you’re an up-and-coming prosecutor or politician, you better have a plan to go after big tech. All the cool kids seem to have one. This week, we saw attorneys general offices scrambling to formally launch antitrust investigations. Plans by a group led by the Texas attorney general’s office [to announce]( an investigation into Google seemed like the official kickoff of state-level tech scrutiny—until New York’s attorney general stole the spotlight by announcing a [separate investigation into Facebook Inc.]( That’s on top of separate U.S. Justice Department inquiries. The Federal Trade Commission recently fined Facebook $5 billion and Google $170 million. The heads of antitrust efforts at both federal regulators are testifying in front of Congress on Sept 17. It’s hard to keep track of everyone piling on. There are certainly plenty of ways for politicians and prosecutors to pursue Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc. and Facebook. Beating up on the tech industry is the rare bipartisan issue in a hyper-partisan age, and it is an open question of who will become the face of the tech crackdown. This gives a wide range of players the incentive to plant their flags. Senator Josh Hawley, who, to his credit, was early to the tech-as-political-piñata party, put out a statement Friday reminding everyone that he was “proud to launch the first antitrust and privacy investigation of Big Tech by an attorney general two years ago.” (In fact, his investigation asked many of the same questions [Texas’s attorney general began looking into in 2011](.) As we saw with Microsoft in the 1990s, these inquiries alone can have a meaningful impact. It can put tech companies on the defensive and make them careful not to overstep and wary about making acquisitions that could get blocked by regulators. That said, we live in an era when tech executives have remained fairly brazen. Facebook, in particular, hasn’t been afraid to acquire rivals and to push the envelope. Even as it is under the microscope, the company is launching a cryptocurrency and starting to get into [online dating](. The $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission barely registered. One problem with multiple efforts trying to turn anti-tech sentiment into legal cases, rather than a single principled critique, is that things can get a little muddled. The attorneys general investigations into Facebook covers both privacy and antitrust. Those are pretty different issues and could allow, for example, Facebook to compromise on privacy to avoid giving much ground on antitrust. On the other hand, a benefit of having so many different government agencies focused on big tech is that they’re working in parallel. Each one can hone in on their own complaint without worrying about another issue slipping through the cracks. They all want a career-defining case. It seems like there are plenty of them to go around. —[Eric Newcomer](mailto:enewcomer@bloomberg.net)  And here’s what you need to know in global technology news Apple downplayed an iPhone attack. Google suggested a software vulnerability lasted two years, while [Apple says it’s just two months](.  Snap is the best internet stock this year. Who would have [predicted that](?  Huawei is in talks with ProtonMail about preloading the service on its phones. Talks come as the Chinese company may [lose access to Google services](.   Sponsored Content by [Darktrace]( As organizations embrace cloud services, the attack surface is increasing. Meanwhile, cloud-based threats are fast and unpredictable, often outpacing existing defenses. But cyber AI is changing the game. Thousands of companies use AI to detect and respond to advanced attackers in the cloud, before they do damage. [Learn what’s missing in cloud security and how cyber AI can help.](   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Bloomberg Technology newsletter Fully Charged. You can tell your friends to [sign up here](.  [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.