Newsletter Subject

Tall tales of a turnaround

From

bloombergbusiness.com

Email Address

noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com

Sent On

Mon, Apr 8, 2019 11:17 AM

Email Preheader Text

From    Hey y’all, it’s Austin. Have you heard the news? Snap is back. After hitting

[Bloomberg] [Fully Charged]( From [Bloomberg](   [FOLLOW US [Facebook Share]]( [Twitter Share]( [SUBSCRIBE [Subscribe]](  Hey y’all, it’s Austin. Have you heard the news? Snap is back. After hitting a historic low in December, the social-media company has seen its share price more than double. Suddenly, [investors]( and [analysts]( have re-boarded the Evan Spiegel rocket ship and suggest it’s finally [primed]( for long-promised hyper growth. A [Jefferies analyst even wrote](, after visiting Snap Inc.’s headquarters last month in Santa Monica, California, that it “felt like it had grown up from a startup to a more mature company.” Wait, isn’t this the same company that has suffered from a string of [top]( [executive]( [departures](—including the finance chief hired from Amazon.com Inc., who left [after just 8 months](—while also still trading roughly [30 percent below its initial public offering price](? For a company whose market rallies have been as ephemeral as the content shared on its platform, that sure was a lot of optimism regained overnight. As a [blessing]( of technology unicorns have gone public in recent years, frenzied investors have watched their hopes of booming share prices dashed. In many cases, the reality-distortion field of Silicon Valley gave way to the reality-defeating landscape of Wall Street—both perhaps equally as irrational. Yet, on the public markets, these ailing tech companies seem to get more leeway than their traditional corporate counterparts. Every slight uptick in their stock—even if shares remain well below IPO pricing years after their debut—is seen as a surefire sign of a turnaround and its founder-CEO’s latent genius. With a bundle of public listings on the horizon following Lyft Inc., from Uber Technologies Inc. to Pinterest Inc., Peloton Interactive Inc. and Postmates Inc., it’s worth examining this frustratingly common narrative trajectory, the post-IPO equivalent of the so-called [startup hype cycle](. Once-hot meal-kit startup Blue Apron Holdings Inc. has [plummeted]( a whopping 90 percent below its IPO price. Popular hardware makers, such as GoPro Inc. and Fitbit Inc., are down roughly 70 percent. And formerly sizzling consumer internet companies, including Groupon Inc. and LendingClub Corp., are down around 80 percent. No matter the decline, even [tiny gains]( in revenue or an [incremental new]( product [can apparently]( serve as [indications of a certain comeback](. Analysts and prominent investors often give tech companies the benefit of the doubt for minor signs of life, even if the stocks are underperforming by all objective measures. This trend is even more pronounced if you factor in the exuberance of first-day pops. Dropbox Inc., for example, [soared]( nearly 40 percent when it started trading around this time last year. Its shares are now 22 percent below that price, and yet, analysts are [cooing]( and labeling it a “[magic box](.” The same could be [said]( of [Cloudera Inc.](, [Pandora Media Inc.]( and [Twitter Inc.]( (Any doubters, again, just don’t understand the “[magic](.”) In the private markets, startups are crucified for such drops or stalls in valuation. Foursquare Labs Inc., for example, got [ripped apart]( when it took a [down round]( several years ago. (The company, which has continued raising funds privately, has [still not gone public](.) Venture capitalists like to refer to such startup lulls as troughs of sorrow or valleys of despair, their transitional downfall apparently as predictable as [clockwork](. This standard somehow gets scrambled in the public markets. It’s unclear what ought to count as a true turnaround, but it seems fair that a comeback should only be ascribed to a tech company that has at least surpassed the market’s initial expectations. —[Austin Carr](mailto:acarr54@bloomberg.net)  And here’s what you need to know in global technology news Tesla's board probed an alleged incident involving CEO Elon Musk, who was [accused of pushing an outgoing employee]( in a heated confrontation.  After Google's AI ethics board imploded, questions remain about [who will check]( the technology giant's societal influence.  Facebook was found to have been hosting dozens of cybercriminal groups on its platform, including [hackers and spamming professionals](.  Tencent and Hyundai are working together to develop self-driving technology for autonomous vehicles, South Korea's Maeil Business Newspaper [reports](.  Join Bloomberg's flagship tech event, Sooner Than You Think 2019, on June 11 to 12 in London. Learn and be inspired by the world's most influential tech leaders. View the website [here](, and apply to attend.    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Bloomberg Technology newsletter Fully Charged. You can tell your friends to [sign up here](.  [Unsubscribe]( | [Bloomberg.com]( | [Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

Marketing emails from bloombergbusiness.com

View More
Sent On

20/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

19/07/2024

Sent On

18/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.