Hey everyone, itâs Spencer in Seattle. Amazonâs first rivals, booksellers across America, want to have their complaints heard in the Federal [View in browser](
[Bloomberg](
Hey everyone, itâs Spencer in Seattle. Amazonâs first rivals, booksellers across America, want to have their complaints heard in the Federal Trade Commissionâs antitrust lawsuit against the e-commerce giant. But first... Three things you need to know today: ⢠Samsungâs new chips chief rallied employees after the [surprise departure of his predecessor](
⢠Apple will overhaul its Siri digital assistant [with a boost of AI features](
⢠Meta has changed Facebookâs feeds to [better compete with TikTok]( Opposite sides A dispute between the FTC and the [American Booksellers Association]( highlights the complexities of the governmentâs [landmark antitrust case]( against online retail giant Amazon.com Inc. thatâs scheduled to go to trial in 2026. The group wants to intervene in the case and [force Amazon to stop selling books]( as a retailer. The FTC, meanwhile, says the booksellers should go file their own lawsuit since their issue doesnât neatly overlap with the governmentâs case. At first glance, the two sides appear to contradict each other â a discrepancy than Amazon can spin to make them look chaotic and clueless. The FTCâs [179-page lawsuit]( against the e-commerce giant barely mentions books at all. In one section, the government says Amazon boosted profits on book sales by $57 million in 2018 by using an algorithm to raise prices when it expected competitors would follow them with their own hikes. The FTCâs argument, in this instance, is that Amazonâs monopoly power in online shopping lets it control prices, enabling the company to raise the prices for its own benefit to the detriment of consumers. The agency said Amazon engaged in the same practices in other product categories beyond books, padding its profits by more than $1 billion over a three-year period ending in 2018. The booksellers, meanwhile, argue Amazon used its market clout to negotiate low wholesale book prices from publishers and sell them at discounts that smaller bookstores couldnât match. Their argument is that Amazon drove consumer prices down to unsustainable levels to put smaller businesses under. As contradictory as it seems, both arguments could be true. Amazon chose books as its first product category in 1994 because theyâre easy to ship and generally arenât needed urgently. The company gradually expanded into other categories for its shopping platform, like CDs and DVDs, electronics and toys. Today, Amazon can offer you a gallon of milk, a refrigerator to put it in, and a backyard shed to house the refrigerator. The company has used different strategies to enter various product areas and train shoppers to buy things online that they would usually get at a store. And Amazon can dial prices up and down depending on what kind of competition it faces in the moment. The book industry is Amazonâs oldest rival, so it makes sense that the booksellers have some gripes that sound distinct from the FTCâs overall case. Amazon says the booksellersâ group recycles [old legal arguments](that the organization has already lost. For now, the fate of the FTCâs litigation hinges largely on the results of the presidential election and whether a new administration reshapes the agency or whether President Joe Bidenâs reelection gives Chair Lina Khan time to finish her case. In the meantime, Amazon and the FTC have found some common ground. Neither wants the booksellers involved.â[Spencer Soper](mailto:ssoper@bloomberg.net) The big story The US has stepped up its efforts to keep cutting-edge technology from China, by slowing large sales of powerful AI chips from US companies to customers in the Middle East. The US government is concerned that the chips may be [passed through to China despite a US ban on the sales.Â]( One to watch
[Watch Abel Avellan, chief executive officer of AST SpaceMobile, interviewed on Bloomberg Television about space technology and his companyâs partnerships with wireless carriers.]( Get fully charged Dellâs strong results werenât enough for investors seeking greater sales gains from its [powerful AI servers](. British fintech Revolut sees Asia as a [big market for expansion](. The US Justice Department is closely monitoring deals AI companies have cut with media firms and content providers to make sure they are legal, [a top antitrust official says](. Christieâs said hackers accessed the [passport data of some clients](. More from Bloomberg Get Bloomberg Tech weeklies in your inbox: - [Cyber Bulletin]( for coverage of the shadow world of hackers and cyber-espionage
- [Game On]( for reporting on the video game business
- [Power On]( for Apple scoops, consumer tech news and more
- [Screentime]( for a front-row seat to the collision of Hollywood and Silicon Valley
- [Soundbite]( for reporting on podcasting, the music industry and audio trends
- [Q&AI]( for answers to all your questions about AI Follow Us Like getting this newsletter? [Subscribe to Bloomberg.com]( for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights. Want to sponsor this newsletter? [Get in touch here](. You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Tech Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, [sign up here]( to get it in your inbox.
[Unsubscribe](
[Bloomberg.com](
[Contact Us]( Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022 [Ads Powered By Liveintent]( [Ad Choices](