Newsletter Subject

How technology poisoned the future

From

billbonnersdiary.com

Email Address

bill@billbonnersdiary.com

Sent On

Wed, Nov 8, 2017 05:38 PM

Email Preheader Text

How Technology Poisoned the Future By Bill Bonner, Chairman, Bonner & Partners RANCHO SANTANA, NICAR

[Bill Bonner's Diary]( How Technology Poisoned the Future By Bill Bonner, Chairman, Bonner & Partners [bill bonner] RANCHO SANTANA, NICARAGUA – Over the weekend, bitcoin rose to more than $7,500 – a 200% gain from when we bought in June. “Is that all?” replies a colleague. “I got into a bitcoin miner at 2 cents a share. It’s now trading at $7. “I’ll do the math for you. If you had put in $1,000, you’d have $350,000 today.” What to make of it? Recommended Link [The only way to get the name of "the next big thing in cryptocurrencies" (Expires soon)]( Teeka's best cryptocurrency picks have soared 1,241%, 2,050% and even 14,354% in as little as six months. He's found a new pick that he calls "the next big thing in cryptocurrencies." It's trading for under $1, and until tonight at midnight you can get its name for FREE. [Click here for details]( -- Better Money? “Nothing like this has ever happened before,” says another colleague. He’s right. Bitcoin offers neither products nor services. It makes neither profits nor losses. It is neither animal, vegetable, nor mineral… quick nor dead… ridiculous nor sublime… Laurel nor Hardy. Is bitcoin better money? A bubble? Perhaps it is both. We repeat our caution to readers. Bitcoin is not an investment; there’s no way to analyze or estimate the likely return. It’s not a speculation or even a gamble; there’s no way to compute the odds. But it’s hard to resist an asset that doubles every 90 days. Our advice: Treat it like entertainment. Put in a little money. If you get rich, lucky you. If you lose your money, don’t worry about it; enjoy the show. Do not count on bitcoin for your retirement. Flying Pigs Bitcoin is based on new technology. And new technology is our subject recently. Most people believe that progress and time are the same thing. If it is newer, it must be better! Think of all the progress we’ve made since we lived in caves and ate raw bats. It’s easy to believe that time will inevitably bring more progress. Sometime in the future, we will discover cures for cancer and foot rot. Women will be treated like men. Energy will be free and clean. No one will have to work (thanks to obliging robots). And everyone will get a check from the government. Cars will finally fly, too. Or maybe pigs? But new technology doesn’t always make us richer or better off. (What did the nuclear bomb do for us?) And some new technologies seem to destroy GDP rather than add to it. Recommended Link [Warning: We're removing Teeka's emergency briefing at midnight]( If you haven't seen Teeka's emergency cryptocurrency briefing, you're running out of time – we're taking it down at midnight tonight. This is your last chance to get the name of “the next big thing in cryptocurrencies”… Teeka's forecast for 2018… and to hear the top ideas of Teeka's two Bitcoin millionaire special guests. [Details here]( -- Innocent and Charming Today, we introduce a more shocking and thoroughly disagreeable idea: Maybe the future won’t be all it’s cracked up to be. Maybe the past was actually better. Imagine that you lived in a comfortable, nice house from the 1950s… in a cute little town like Mayberry, North Carolina. You had a small TV set in the living room, where you watched Amos ‘n’ Andy and I Love Lucy… a 1956 Chevy in the garage… and – instead of the iPhone X – you had an old-fashioned telephone on a party line. “Mabel…” you’d say to the operator… “would you put me through to Eleanor?” “Oh, I’d like to, Doris. But she’s at the beauty parlor.” Sounds delightfully innocent and charming, doesn’t it? Of course, you would have none of the tech breakthroughs and refinements of the last 50 years: No opioids paid for by the government. No cruise control. No GPS. No remote control. No cellphone. No laptop. No microwave oven. Would that be so bad? Recommended Link [New Legislation: 33 States Pave the Way for Strange New Car]( Not since the Model T replaced the horse and buggy has America seen a shift this huge in the way we drive. Within the next 2 years, we will see 10 million of these cars on the roads—a 49,000% increase from today. [Click here for details]( -- Sleep-Deprived It is estimated, for example, that the average person now spends 8.4 hours a day on some form of electronic communications device. Surely, that marks “progress.” Or does it? Experts warn that people now spend so much time on their iPads, iPhones, and other gadgets that they aren’t getting enough sleep. One doctor, quoted in the Daily Mail newspaper, guessed that two-thirds of the British population suffer from sleep deprivation. People are spending more than half their waking hours in communion with an electronic device. What did they do with those hours in the 1950s? Talk? Read? Think? We know what has been gained: hours of distraction and idle amusement on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and email. But what has been lost? We don’t really know. A pleasant greeting on the street… a fresh tomato on your plate… a free parking place… a wink from the bookie… a cold beer with the undertaker… a kind word at a funeral… a good book by an open fire… a pile of leaves in the front yard… …a moonlit night… a conversation on the front porch… Isn’t it possible that by barging blindly into the future, like a toddler changing his own diaper, we make a mess of things? More to come… Regards, [Signature] Bill Further Reading: Learn how you can take part in the bitcoin show that Bill mentioned above. Our go-to cryptocurrency expert Teeka Tiwari just released [a free cryptocurrency webinar](. Teeka spent years traveling the globe, speaking with high-level crypto insiders. [Here’s what he uncovered.]( MARKET INSIGHT: DISCOUNT RETAIL CLIMBS By Chris Lowe, Editor at Large, Bonner & Partners [bill bonner] America’s middle class is shrinking… And it’s showing up in their shopping habits. Today’s chart looks at the performance of stock in discount retailer Dollar Tree, which sells items for $1 or less. And it compares it with the performance of stocks in middle-class retailers JCPenney, Macy’s, and Target. [Chart] As you can see, over the past 12 months, shares in Dollar Tree are up 27%. That compares to losses of 71%, 52%, and 13% for JCPenney, Macy’s, and Target, respectively. – Chris Lowe FEATURED READS [Can Bitcoin Be Tamed?]( As Bill mentioned above, nobody knows precisely what will happen to bitcoin. But the world’s largest derivatives exchange sees a legitimate future for bitcoin as an asset, not a currency. [Japan Back on Top]( Most people remember the Japanese stock market crash of the early ’90s. In 1990, the Nikkei stock index plummeted to half its peak. But things may be turning around for Japanese stocks. The Nikkei just posted a 25-year high. [How to Solve the Pension Crisis]( States like Illinois are in the midst of a full-blown pension crisis. Crisis Investing editor Nick Giambruno details the one unconventional step governments will take to avoid disaster… and shows how you can profit. MAILBAG In the mailbag, more discussion on the [problems with 21st-century companies](… The news is far worse for Amazon than you realize. Its storage “rental” service renting out space on the hard drives and solid-state drives in its servers is a huge money-maker. And that money subsidizes the retail losses, down to the overall loss you’re talking about. Things are much worse than many people realize. And yet the stock price keeps going up. – Jeff J. I have to tell you, Amazon and Tesla are way ahead of their competition! To stay ahead of the competition, they have to pour everything back into their growing enterprise! This is the new concept! Whether it works remains to be seen! But right now, they are leading everyone in their respective fields! You cannot argue that! Giving money back to shareholders is not the way to stay ahead in today’s world! Right now, I would rather own Amazon or Tesla than General Motors or General Electric. – William C. The vendors on Amazon are making money. They are eager to keep the customer pleased. Their profit is unrecorded because there are so many small entrepreneurs. Amazon makes it easy to be a vendor and it also polices the vendors to serve the customer. Amazon’s customer service is beyond the call of duty. Some of those vendors don’t admit they are in backwater countries, and you get bad or counterfeit products from them, but Amazon gets your money back to you. It’s possible Amazon is waiting until after the competitors are defunct to raise prices like the mafia is known to do. – Emily S. Regarding Amazon, I think there are some things that I think a lot of people overlook (although I’m not a stockholder and wouldn’t touch it, even with Trump’s money), and one big one is the 2 million people – individuals and small companies, that sell on Amazon. I read that 40% of Amazon’s sales come through these vendors. Amazon makes it easy to build a business for practically anyone willing to do some research, using their FBA program and special shipping rates. But they don’t do this for free, they take a good sized cut of every item sold and also charge advertising and other fees. Also they have recently started charging to store the goods in their warehouses. I would imagine this is one of the things that enables them to sell other products at a loss. All of these new garage businesses have to add to GDP, although to your point, I’m not sure it makes up for what they destroy. But Amazon is much more than an online store, they have a myriad of creative ways to generate revenue for themselves. – Rick T. I hope I’m not being too familiar by calling you Bill. After having read so many of your articles and books, it just seemed appropriate. Your Diary Market Insight on labor participation rates raised some questions in my mind. This chart is another that seems to have an eerie connection to the point in time when the U.S. went off the gold standard. Just a coincidence? Also, what is the effect of so many two-income families on this chart? So since 1975 or so, the participation rate climbed. But before that date, we were much lower in participation rate. What do we use for normal here? Everything is related to the economy and GDP. But how? Just some musings on my part. – Gordon S. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… As Bill mentioned above, there are still a lot of questions surrounding bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. If you’ve been curious about these cryptocurrencies, we recommend you start right here. In this free webinar, cryptocurrency investing expert Teeka Tiwari shows why bitcoin could be headed for $10,000 as early as January. [Watch right here.]( [Video]( [Bonner and Partners]( © Bonner & Partners 55 NE 5th Avenue, Suite 100, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.bonnerandpartners.com]( This e-mail was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Customer Service Bonner & Partners welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact us, call Toll Free: (800) 681-1765, International: (443) 353-4462, Mon-Fri: 9am-7pm or email us [here](mailto:feedback@bonnerandpartners.com). Having trouble getting your e-mails? Add us to your address book. Get Instructions [here](… © 2017 Bonner & Partners, 55 NE 5th Avenue Suite 100, Delray Beach, FL 33483, USA. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. It is not designed to meet your personal situation – we are not financial advisors nor do we give personalized advice. The opinions expressed herein are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. It may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Recommendations in Bonner & Partners publications should be made only after consulting with your advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. You shouldn't make any decision based solely on what you read here. Bonner & Partners writers and publications do not take compensation in any form for covering those securities or commodities. Bonner & Partners expressly forbids its writers from owning or having an interest in any security that they recommend to their readers. Furthermore, all other employees and agents of Bonner & Partners and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a printed publication is mailed.

EDM Keywords (271)

yet writers would worry world wink whole went way warehouses waiting vendors vendor use us update unrecorded undertaker trump trading touch top tonight today time think things thing tesla tell teeka tamed talking taking take sure subscribed subject street store stocks stockholder stock still spending spend speculation space solve since shrinking shows showing show shocking shift shareholders share services service servers serve sent sell seen seems see security securities say running roads right rick reviewing resist replies replaced repeat reliable released related refinements redistribution recommend realize read questions question put publisher publications prospectus progress profit products problems posted possible point plate pile performance people peak past part owning one odds obtained obligation normal none nikkei news newer name myriad must musings much money model missed mind midst midnight mess meet maybe math many makes make mailed mailbag mafia made lot lost losses loss lose lived little like less leaves laptop known know keep june investment introduce internet interest instead innocent huge hours horse hope hear headed hardy hard happen half guaranteed gps government got goods go get gdp garage gamble gadgets future funeral free found form forecast following feedback familiar example everything everyone even estimated estimate enjoy enables employees emily email effect economy easy early eager duty doris distraction discussion diary diaper destroy designed defunct day date curious cryptocurrencies cracked covering course count conversation consulting compute competitors competition compares company communion colleague clean check chart charming cellphone caves caution case cars cancer calls calling call business build buggy bought books bookie bitcoin bill beyond better believe based asset articles another analyze amazon agents advisor admit add 40 27 2018 1990 1950s 13

Marketing emails from billbonnersdiary.com

View More
Sent On

25/12/2017

Sent On

24/12/2017

Sent On

04/12/2017

Sent On

28/11/2017

Sent On

26/11/2017

Sent On

25/11/2017

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.