Newsletter Subject

🔥 Talk about a hot topic! 🔥

From

beverlyhills-md.com

Email Address

jlayke@beverlyhills-md.com

Sent On

Thu, May 2, 2024 01:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

READER RESPONSES HERE: Should beauty filters be banned? I must say, {NAME} — this community NEVER fails to deliver! The other day, I came to you with a controversial question: Should beauty filters be banned on social media? And as soon as I pressed “send,” the responses started to roll in from BOTH sides of the spectrum… So it only seemed right to share a few with you today! (After all, I find this to be an incredibly important topic — as both a father AND a cosmetic surgeon.) Now in case you missed my original message, this entire issue centers around mental health. See, beauty filters on social media are becoming more and more advanced, and therefore MUCH HARDER to distinguish from real life. The problem? Many people are concerned these AI filters can have a negative impact on self esteem — especially in young women — as users compare themselves to unrealistic (and digitally enhanced) beauty standards. I have to say, it seems many of your fellow subscribers agree with this perspective. Take Yvette, who took a hard stance against beauty filters. Ă‚ “I strongly believe filters should be stopped. They create self-image problems for so many who believe they are less than the fake pictures presented.” Then there’s Jan, who brings up another valid concern. She says beauty filters don’t just have the potential to impact mental health… They’re designed to give everyone the same features (like bigger lips, a slimmer jawline, and brighter eyes) — creating a generalized definition of what’s considered “beautiful.” Ă‚ “I’m all for taking the best care of ourselves and optimizing solutions for looking our best. But I can’t imagine homogenizing ourselves to conform to someone else’s idea of perfection. I guess I like my own unique style. So my answer is that beauty filters should be banned.” Such a great point, Jan… But this begs the question: what can realistically be done to limit the negative impacts of beauty filters? Well, I thought Thea had an interesting idea… Ă‚ “I wish every enhanced image had to include a disclaimer — whether the photoshopped cover of a magazine or the use of beauty filters online. If we could just be fully informed about the images we’re seeing, it might help decrease the negative impact of the enhancements, and help us be more realistic and compassionate with ourselves and each other.” So true, Thea! At the end of the day, knowing altered images are fake means less pressure to emulate them. But of course, not everyone agrees banning filters is the answer. Some mentioned beauty filters can be great in a pinch — like when you want to look your best but don’t have time to put on makeup. Then there’s Ness, who shared another school of thought: Ă‚ “I honestly don't think BANNING will help at all. When in human history did banning something actually work? I understand the danger of beauty filters… but I believe the only way to deal with this issue is to teach people not to believe everything they see… and to stop putting so much energy into chasing unrealistic beauty ideals.” I certainly see where Ness is coming from. After all, the heart of the issue isn’t that this filtering technology exists… It’s how we, as a society, let it affect us. If we teach kindness, acceptance, and empathy — perhaps these filters wouldn’t impact mental health nearly as much… And that’s exactly where Patrice went with her message: Ă‚ “Perhaps another approach is to reinforce inner beauty… kids and young adults think that their only value is to be perceived as beautiful in the eyes of others. By reinforcing, rewarding, and praising each child's individual brilliance and talents more than their physical features, maybe their self-esteem would be enhanced.” Preach, Patrice! No matter where you stand on the issue, I think we can all agree: This world could use more positivity… And that goes for the way we treat ourselves, too. With that, I’ll sum it up with some wise words from Jacqueline: Ă‚ “I think it all boils down to loving and respecting yourself — and being your best YOU!” {NAME}, I hope today’s email serves as a reminder to give yourself grace… Because the fact is, the images we see online aren’t always reality. As always, thanks for being a part of the BHMD community. Your responses never fail to provide great perspective, and reading them really brings a smile to my face. :) Your Beverly Hills MD, Dr. John Layke Ă‚ Ă‚ ‚ Ă‚ Ă‚ Ă‚ Ă‚ This email was sent to {EMAIL} by jlayke@beverlyhills-md.com [Edit Profile](Ă‚ |Ă‚ [Manage Subscriptions](Ă‚ |Ă‚ [VIP Discounts](Ă‚ |Ă‚ [JoinĂ‚ TextĂ‚ Club]( |Ă‚ [Subscribe](Ă‚ Ă‚ 8391 Beverly Blvd., #471, Los Angeles, CA 90048 Ă‚ Ă‚ [Report Spam](Ă‚ Ă‚ These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Ă‚

Marketing emails from beverlyhills-md.com

View More
Sent On

11/05/2024

Sent On

10/05/2024

Sent On

08/05/2024

Sent On

05/05/2024

Sent On

04/05/2024

Sent On

30/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.