Newsletter Subject

Reason #209381 why I don’t go blind obsessing over email metrics

From

bensettle.com

Email Address

ben@bensettle.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 29, 2023 02:44 AM

Email Preheader Text

It’s always been amusing watching people get tweaked over my so-called “anti-metrics”

It’s always been amusing watching people get tweaked over my so-called “anti-metrics” approach. i.e., I simply don’t care about them with email, much less pay attention to them. All I pay attention to is sales and sales trends over time. And what’s even more amusing than watching the goo-roo fanboys get tweaked about it, snark at me about it, pronounce how I’m not gonna make it… (I am still going strong 21+ years in, but okay, Pumpkin Puss…) is even many of these same peoples’ marketing heroes don’t track their own stuff, even if they preach it to everyone else, nearly as much as they pretend to, if at all. And, yet even more amusing than that is how futile a lot of tracking is due to the lies about attribution told by people selling tracking tools. Maybe “lies” is a bit strong. I suspect most think they’re doing the Lord’s work. But a lot of it is, ironically, just making Psychological marketers who pride themselves on attribution and “not guessing!” have to guess even more about what works or doesn’t work than people such as my noble self. Don’t believe me? That’s okay, I don’t expect you to. These ideas I talk about are antithetical to what many are hearing in the Facebook groups they haunt. Been to enough masterminds and watching the room freak out whenever I bring this stuff up to the point where I don’t bother casting this pearl before swine anymore. But, since you are not swine… and are presumably reading this because it is of interest to you, then maybe you will believe my business partner in BerserkerMail and former Navy Nuclear Engineer-turned-marketing automation specialist Troy Broussard instead — who built his entire business and reputation on email marketing automation, which means mastering tracking & testing at a truly scientific (not fake online marketer science) level, and what he says about this. Specifically what he said in a talk we did together called: “Image Cops” (Showing the science behind how images can tank inbox & Primary tab delivery) Here is what he said: === ... I have seen some of the most complex shit in the world for tracking. I’m really good friends with a guy that that has a really in-depth tracking solution that he sells. But at the end of the day, it’s about like attribution and things like that, that they can’t really track. They know that you clicked on the link in your email, but was that what actually generated the sale or was it because they saw the retargeting ad on Facebook that reminded them of the email that was sitting in their inbox? Or did they hear the radio spot and then go look at your website, but later get retargeted? And then instead of clicking and retargeting, they went back to the email… All of these systems are about attribution. But there truly is no way to properly attribute it. It’s a lot of guesswork and based on last trackable actions. But that doesn’t mean that that’s what actually attributed to the sale. And, like you said [about this Ben], like who is the spokesperson? What is the relationship? How much history do they have on those lists? All of those things go into the sale far more than any kind of open or click rate tracking. === Something to think about or not think about at your displeasure. Either way, I will just say this: If you take the approach Troy is mocking above (being obsessed with attribution as some kind of end-all, be-all) then you, my friend, are what’s known… as a Psychological Marketer, and not a Sociological Marketer. Which means you are very likely guessing far more than I am. Yes, even though I don’t obsess over metrics. And this is especially true, in my experience, in today’s online and community-building atmosphere online, where it’s not as simple as just running an A/B test to a direct mail list or newspaper or whatever. Far more moving parts nowadays. Trying to attribute a sale to any one thing is probably not going to give you the whole story. And this is especially the case the more influential you become. The good news: If you want to exploit this phenomenon (while still tracking to your heart’s content, as I am not saying not to track, lest the goo-roo fanboys have heart burn over this email), and use it to your advantage… then see the upcoming September Email Players issue which is all about Sociological Marketing vs Psychological Marketing. The former is, in my opinion, superior to the latter. Even though most people in marketing I've seen do the latter. The deadline to subscribe is in just a few days. If you want in hit the jump below: [https∶//www.EmailPlayers.com]( Ben Settle This email was sent by Ben Settle as owner of Settle, LLC. Copyright © 2023 Settle, LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this email may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from Settle, LLC. Click here to [unsubscribe]( Settle, LLC PO Box 1056 Gold Beach Oregon 97444 USA

Marketing emails from bensettle.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.