Newsletter Subject

🎓 The impact of credible vs sketchy marketing

From

ariyh.com

Email Address

team@mail.ariyh.com

Sent On

Tue, Sep 12, 2023 06:29 AM

Email Preheader Text

Highly credible marketing tactics are up to 63% more effective than less credible tactics ?

Highly credible marketing tactics (e.g. third-party certifications) are up to 63% more effective than less credible tactics (e.g. actors playing customers)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 September 12, 2023 | [Read Online]( The impact of credible vs sketchy marketing Highly credible marketing tactics (e.g. third-party certifications) are up to 63% more effective than less credible tactics (e.g. actors playing customers) [Thomas McKinlay]( [fb]( [tw]( [in]( [email](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Ariyh&body=The%20impact%20of%20credible%20vs%20sketchy%20marketing%3A%20Highly%20credible%20marketing%20tactics%20%28e.g.%20third-party%20certifications%29%20are%20up%20to%2063%25%20more%20effective%20than%20less%20credible%20tactics%20%28e.g.%20actors%20playing%20customers%29%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fariyh.beehiiv.com%2Fp%2Fcredible-vs-sketchy-marketing) New to [Ariyh](? This is a 3min practical summary of a scientific study 🎓 Join 21,759 evidence-based marketers that grow using science, not opinions 📈 [Subscribe here]( Today’s insight is brought to you by… [Storyblok]( How do you build a result-driving online experience, quickly and effectively? Sydney FC wanted to build a new online experience to drive hype for the opening of their new stadium. 🏟️ Here’s how they [transformed their online stadium experience in just 4 months](. 🚀 The results? 1M+ page events and 370% higher match revenues. [Find out how you can do the same]( Want to sponsor Ariyh? [Here’s all you need to know](. 📝 Intro As you walk through a grocery store, two sales reps approach you separately, pitching a dishwashing soap. The first salesperson excitedly comes up to you and tells you it’s endorsed by Kim Kardashian, who says it keeps her dishes sparkling after every dinner party she throws. The second salesperson hands you a pamphlet with reviews from customers, who share how the dishwashing soap helped them cut through impossible to clean grease. Chances are, the second salesperson sounds more credible. You doubt whether Kim Kardashian washes dishes regularly. And this credibility matters. A lot. P.S.: Remember when you’re trying to persuade, focus on your [three biggest selling points]( - listing all your benefits beyond that backfires and makes people more skeptical. Previous insight: [Show products next to the problem they solve]( (more insights [here]() People like and trust a product more when it’s marketed with credible tactics Channels: Marketing strategy | Marketing Communications | Ads | Messaging For: B2C. Can be tested for B2B Research date: January 2017 📈 Recommendation Favor marketing tactics that are highly credible (e.g. guarantees, 3rd party certifications, expert endorsements). Avoid tactics that people may be skeptical of (e.g. [limited-time deals for no apparent reason](, fake or exaggerated customer opinions) When people are skeptical of you or your message, they will dislike your brand and product. If your message seems credible, the opposite will happen. 🎓 Findings - When people consider a marketing tactic that’s trying to persuade them to be credible, they develop a positive view of the product. If they are skeptical of the tactic, they will like the product less than they originally did. - As part of a series of 5 online experiments: - People saw ads for headphones using either highly credible tactics (reviews by industry experts) or low credibility tactics (actors playing customers giving positive reviews) - High credibility tactics made them rate the product 11.7% better (vs not seeing the ad) - Low credibility tactics made them rate the product 15.9% worse (vs not seeing the ad) - After seeing an ad, people were told either that the company was accredited by the Better Business Bureau or that it was denied certification. Those that heard it was denied, rated the company and ad 39.6% less credible 🧠Why it works - When we realize someone is trying to persuade us (e.g. a company marketing to us), we activate our [persuasion knowledge](: our response to attempts to convince us. - This makes us start to question things like a company’s motives, its credibility, and who is delivering the information. - Because we know we’re being persuaded, our default is to be [skeptical]( about the information shown, or the source of the information. If we don’t trust the information or its source, we view the attempt to convince us negatively. - But the opposite is also true - if we see a tactic as credible, using our persuasion knowledge leads us to like the company and its product more. We believe the message and trust them. 🧐 [The Social Juice]( - The newsletter for marketers who care who they reach The newsletter that keeps you updated about [everything that matters in marketing & social media](: - To the point (and in bullet points!) - Cuts out what doesn’t matter - Every Sunday, in your inbox It’s as simple as that. [Join 11,000 marketers and give it a try](, and hop off anytime you like! [Check it out]( This announcement was sponsored. Want your brand here? [Click here](. ✋ Limitations - The researchers asked people to actively think about how the company or salespeople were trying to convince them. The effect may be weaker when people are less conscious that they’re being persuaded. - The experiments used relatively extreme examples of low credibility arguments (e.g. charging for returns, comparing the product to a jewel). There are often less obvious distinctions between tactics people would consider credible or be skeptical of. 🏢 Companies using this - Almost all companies try to improve or strengthen their messaging by making it as credible as possible. - Functional products, usually bought after research or prior planning, use this extensively: - Expert endorsements are used for products as diverse as dentists recommending toothpaste, makeup artists recommending concealer, and chefs endorsing pans (e.g. “Gordon Ramsay calls HexClad ‘the Rolls-Royce of pans’”) - Third-party accreditations include awards for car manufacturers, airlines, or certifications for product quality, manufacturing, supply chain, and company working environment - Customer reviews are credible when used properly, and are common for most products. - Guarantees to match the lowest prices are particularly popular for electronics and in the travel industry. Toyota has dedicated pages for each of its models to showcase third-party awards for key selling points such as safety, resale value, and value for money. ⚡ Steps to implement - Try to eliminate tactics and messages that are not credible, and focus on those with high credibility. - Tactics that are generally more credible include: - Guarantees to match competitors’ price - Offering long trial periods or [warranties]( for your products, and the option for a full refund - Expert opinions from professionals in your field - Showcasing third-party awards and certifications - Having your salespeople seem like [experts in the category]( or give customers detailed proposals based on their discussions - Data about customer experiences (e.g. real customer ratings, success rates) - Tactics that are generally less credible include: - Making your returns process [cumbersome]( or [charging a restocking fee for returns]( - Putting products on [“limited time” sale]( without a clear reason - Using paid actors to simulate customers - Celebrity or influencer endorsements that seem disingenuous - Fake or highly filtered customer reviews 🔍 Study type Online experiments. 📖 Research [Beyond Skepticism: Can Accessing Persuasion Knowledge Bolster Credibility?]( Journal of Consumer Research (January 2017) 🏫 Researchers - [Mathew S. Isaac](. Albers School of Business and Economics, Seattle University. - [Kent Grayson](. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University. Remember: This is a scientific discovery. In the future it will probably be better understood and could even be proven wrong (that’s [how science works](). It may also not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely. Rate today’s insight to help me make Ariyh's next insights 🎓 even more useful 📈 How was today’s insight? [Loved it]( | [Great]( | [Good]( | [Meh]( | [Bad]( - 📘 Supercharge your business with Ariyh’s [Playbook of Pricing & Promotions]( or [Playbook of Ecommerce]( - 📣 Want to advertise on Ariyh? [Here’s all you need to know]( - 🎓 New to Ariyh? -> Subscribe below or read other [3-min marketing insights]( [Subscribe here]( [tw]( [in]( Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © Ariyh Calle Bailen, 11 Barcelona, Barcelona 08010, Spain [[beehiiv logo]Powered by beehiiv](

Marketing emails from ariyh.com

View More
Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

07/05/2024

Sent On

03/05/2024

Sent On

30/04/2024

Sent On

23/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.