Newsletter Subject

Slideshow World for Friday November 6, 2020

From

arcamaxcomics.com

Email Address

ezines@arcamaxcomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 6, 2020 06:38 AM

Email Preheader Text

Interesting slide shows about the world Slideshow World by Sponsor every day. Usually around $500-$1

Interesting slide shows about the world Slideshow World by [ArcaMax](?ezine=782&r=B5-iQZ3pvvTdES_GhoA8xmnSFqTbAh43bESiOhtAvatDOjMyNzAwODM2NDpKOjE5NjU3OTQ6TDo3ODI6Ujo3MTk0NDk6VjoxMjk) Sponsor [[firstName], have you seen this yet? This is real and it's putting money into my bank account]( every day. Usually around $500-$1,200, but sometimes up to $2,800. In fact, they're paying out over 500k PER WEEK in commissions... and all you need is a mailing address to collect a check. [Click here to ACTIVATE your account.*]( [Sequels that made fans wait the longest]( Jason Kessler [ Sequels that made fans wait the longest ]( [See full slideshow »]( When a movie captures a viewer’s heart, there’s nothing better than finding out that the story and characters will continue in a sequel. For most movie aficionados, a sequel can feel like reuniting with old friends. These second or third installments in a franchise offer a chance to recapture the magic of the original film and continue the story in a new and interesting way. This explains why sequels often make so much money at the box office—fans are paying to be taken back to a moment in time or a world that holds so much nostalgia for them—and why so many studios see them as easy fodder. However, watching a sequel that took too long to produce can feel like unearthing an artifact from a lost time. Fans can handle a few years in between releases, but waiting periods of more than a decade can lead to a whole lot of confusion. Who was that guy again? How did the original end? Why did I love this so much the first time around? Stacker did its own research into the history of sequels to compile the most definitive list of sequels that made fans wait the longest, using this Wikipedia list as a launching pad. The films were ranked according to waiting periods between their original (or most recent, if part of a larger series) and sequel release. Direct-to-video sequels are included in this list. However, at least one film in each pairing had to have had a true theatrical release to qualify. So read on to discover the Disney film that waited over six decades to continue its story, which beloved Christmas movie went nearly three decades before its follow-up was released, and which horror franchise has been spooking audiences the longest. Who knows, you may even discover a sequel you never even knew existed. Click here to see original movies that were better than their sequels. You may also like: Best and worst Al Pacino movies Visit thestacker.com for similar lists and stories. © 2020 Stacker Media, LLC; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC [Tweet It]( - [Facebook It]( Sponsor [Is your manufacturer's warranty expired?]( Don't be caught off-guard by expensive auto repairs. An extended warranty helps offset the cost. [Click here to get matched today!]( [Counties doing the most and least COVID-19 testing in every state]( Caitlin PenzeyMoog, Researched By Betsy Ladyzhets [ Counties doing the most and least COVID-19 testing in every state ]( [See full slideshow »]( The United States is in the midst of a COVID-19 surge, with a record-setting 85,000 new cases on Oct. 23 after weeks of steadily rising infections. The Midwest, west, and rural areas are experiencing growing outbreaks, and cold temperatures could help the virus flourish even more. This “third wave” of coronavirus outbreaks is prompting the public and policymakers to assess the available data to inform how to combat outbreaks, but breakdowns in data that appear to be straightforward can belie the more-complex realities of infection, transmission, testing, and survival. Test positivity rates, for example, show a simple snapshot of which areas are experiencing climbing rates of infection. But as scientists point out, looking solely to the test positivity rates only reveals one part of the picture: that of the group of people who got tested—not of the whole population. That’s why it’s so important to track testing rates in addition to positivity rates. As John Hopkins’ Coronavirus Resource Center notes, the testing rate, in addition to the number of new daily cases and the positivity rate, are the best metrics “for understanding the reach and severity of COVID-19 in a given area.” With increasing testing comes a more-complete understanding of the coronavirus’ spread and impact across the U.S., down to the county level. And this more complete understanding is what policymakers need when considering imposing new lockdowns, lifting restrictions, and instituting rules around distancing and mask wearing. In an effort to contribute to that fuller picture, Stacker compiled the counties doing the most and least COVID-19 testing in every state. Every Monday, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services updates a dataset on COVID-19 testing at the county level. The data include total tests conducted in every U.S. county, tests per 100,000 population, and test positivity rates, all for a 14-day period. The CMS dataset only includes polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, not antigen or antibody tests, and is compiled from state public health departments and the Department of Health and Human Services. In this story, counties were ranked based on testing rates adjusted by county populations. Test positivity rates are not calculated for counties that have conducted fewer than 20 tests in the past 14 days. State values are calculated by summing total tests from all counties in the state and by averaging county positivity rates in the state. This story includes the most recent data, for Oct. 8 through Oct. 21 (published on Oct. 26). Read on to see which counties in your state are doing the most—and the least—testing to combat COVID-19. You may also like: U.S. metro areas with the worst air pollution Visit thestacker.com for similar lists and stories. © 2020 Stacker Media, LLC; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC [Tweet It]( - [Facebook It]( More Slideshow World from ArcaMax.com - [Highest-paid athletes in the world]( - [100 best albums of the 21st century, according to critics]( - [Can you solve these 'Jeopardy!' clues about the NFL?]( - [Can you solve these 'Jeopardy!' clues about college football?]( - [States with the most flu and pneumonia deaths]( You Might Like [Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( [Click To Unsubscribe]( | [Customer Service]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [California / Nevada Privacy Info]( 11830 Canon Blvd. Ste A, Newport News, Va 23606 Copyright © 2020 ArcaMax Publishing [Facebook]( [Twitter](/ArcaMax)

Marketing emails from arcamaxcomics.com

View More
Sent On

22/05/2023

Sent On

19/05/2023

Sent On

15/05/2023

Sent On

14/05/2023

Sent On

06/05/2023

Sent On

02/05/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.