Newsletter Subject

Ways to save when modernizing your data center

From

amd-member.com

Email Address

memberservices@amd-member.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 15, 2023 07:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

Reap the benefits with the world’s best performing x86 server CPU Follow AMD 1. GD-183: AMD Inf

Reap the benefits with the world’s best performing x86 server CPU [AMD Logo]( [View Online]( [Advance your data center with the world’s best-performing x86 server CPU²] Ways to Save When Modernizing Your Data Center Modernize efficiently while addressing data center sustainability goals. Drive exceptional time-to-insight for your business-critical applications. Leverage the world’s fastest x86 server processor² to optimize your IT architecture, energy efficiency, security¹, and CAPEX/OPEX³. The savings from transforming your data center can be significant regardless of your workload or deployment model. [GET DETAILS]( Follow AMD [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Instagram]( [Linkedin]( [Youtube]( [Twitch TV]( 1. GD-183: AMD Infinity Guard features vary by EPYC™ Processor generations. Infinity Guard security features must be enabled by server OEMs and/or Cloud Service Providers to operate. Check with your OEM or provider to confirm support of these features. Learn more about Infinity Guard at [www.amd.com/en/technologies/infinity-guard]( 2. [SP5-013A](. 96-core EPYC 9654 CPU processors results as of 11/10/2022 using SPECrate®2017_int_base. The AMD EPYC scored 1790 SPECrate®2017_int_base which is higher than all other 2P scores published on the SPEC® website. 2P AMD EPYC 9654 (1790 SPECrate®2017_int_base, 192 total cores, [www.spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2022q4/cpu2017-20221024-32607.html](. SPEC®, SPECrate® and SPEC CPU® are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See [www.spec.org]( for more information. 3. "A 2P AMD EPYC 96 core 9654 CPU powered server, to deliver 2000 VMs with 1 core and 8GB of memory per VM takes an estimated: 35% fewer servers (11 AMD servers vs 17 Intel servers), with a 33% lower annual OPEX and a 19% lower 3-yr TCO than a 2P Intel Xeon 60 core Platinum 8490H CPUs based server solution. The hardware acquisition cost for the AMD solution is $402,490, for Intel it is $744,260, for a CapEx savings of $341,770 or 46% with the AMD solution. Over the 3-years of this analysis, The AMD powered server takes 29% less power with an estimated cost of $83,819 vs the Intel based server power cost of $117,387, using a PUE of 1.7, saving $33,568 with the EPYC solution over the 3 years of this analysis with an estimated US power cost of $0.16 / kWh. The 1st year TCO per VM is $269 or 29% less per VM with the EPYC solution. The 2P EPYC core CPU solution also provides estimated Greenhouse Gas Emission savings emissions avoided equivalent to 95.08 MTCO2e (104.81 US tons) over the 3 years of this analysis which is 34.94 US tons of CO2 annually and is the equivalent of the sequestration equivalent of 38 acres USA forest annually. © 2023 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. AMD, the AMD Arrow logo, Radeon, Radeon PRO, Ryzen, Threadripper, Threadripper PRO, EPYC, Athlon, Instinct and combinations thereof are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Other product names used in this publication are for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA [AMD Home]( | [Copyright 2023]( | [Privacy]( | [Cookie Policy]( | [Trademarks]( | [Contact Us]( This message is intended for {EMAIL}. This message was sent by AMD. You may at any time update your message [preferences]( or [unsubscribe]( from future mailings.

Marketing emails from amd-member.com

View More
Sent On

24/01/2023

Sent On

15/12/2022

Sent On

10/11/2022

Sent On

01/11/2022

Sent On

06/10/2022

Sent On

20/09/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.